Aquaculture extension services: an urgent necessity

Authors

  • Alejandro Mcdonal-Vera UJAT , UNIVERSIDAD JUAREZ AUTONOMA DE TABASCO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19136/ta.a4n1.5749

Keywords:

Aquaculture development, Knowledge dissemination, Rural extension systems, Aquatic food security

Abstract

The growing global demand for food has positioned aquaculture as a key activity for food security. In this context, aquaculture extension —understood as technical support and knowledge transfer to producers— takes on great importance. Its purpose is to support small-scale producers in becoming self-sufficient. This activity faces limitations due to the lack of specific public policies, scarce resources, and mistrust on the part of producers. In Mexico, extension services have been based on the US model, evolving toward a multifunctional approach that considers social, political, economic, and environmental dimensions. Despite its potential, aquaculture extension is still in its infancy and is generally merged with agricultural extension, which has hampered its specific development and effectiveness. Challenges include limited technological infrastructure, producers' lack of knowledge of fundamental technical aspects, and low investment in applied research. In addition, a lack of trust in extension workers, coupled with the poor adaptation of knowledge to the real conditions of producers, prevents a true conversion of knowledge into productivity. It is concluded that extension services must be professional, adapted to the local context, and supported by public policies and investment in research. Only then will it be possible to harness Mexico's aquaculture potential sustainably, promoting innovation, profitability, and well-being for rural communities. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilar, J., Muñoz, M., & Rendón-Medel, R. (2005). El extensionismo rural en México: evolución y perspectivas. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 1(2), 179–194.

Celaya, F., & Almaraz, J. (2018). La acuicultura en México: retos y oportunidades. Revista AquaTIC, 49, 23–34.

Engel, P. (2004). Facilitating innovation: An action-oriented approach and participatory methodology to improve innovative social practice in agriculture. Wageningen University.

FAO. (2016). Extension and advisory services: At the frontline of the response to sustain food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

FAO. (2020). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

FAO. (2022). Agricultural innovation systems: Strengthening extension and advisory services. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

FAO. (2024). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024. Blue transformation in action. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Matus-Parada, J., Martínez-Espinosa, D. A., & Sánchez-Robles, J. (2015). Extensionismo en la acuicultura de bajos recursos. Sociedades Rurales, Producción y Medio Ambiente, (29), 111-136.

Méndez, R. (2006). Perfil del extensionista rural en México: dimensiones para su desarrollo. Revista de Estudios Rurales, 4(1), 45–62.

Pavitt, K. (2005). Innovation processes. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 86–114). Oxford University Press.

Rendón-Medel, R., Muñoz, M., & Aguilar, J. (2015). La innovación en los sistemas agroalimentarios rurales. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 6(2), 239–252.

Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural [SADER]. (2016). Programa de extensionismo rural en México. Gobierno de México.

Zavala, J. (2011). La asistencia técnica en México: balance y perspectivas. Revista Chapingo, Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 17(1), 113–122.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20

How to Cite

Mcdonal-Vera, A. (2026). Aquaculture extension services: an urgent necessity. Tropical Aquaculture, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.19136/ta.a4n1.5749

Most read articles by the same author(s)